Bitcoin Minute: RFK vs Trump vs Kamala on Bitcoin

A comparison of Bitcoin policy positions, careful not to overstate RFK's support and differentiating Trump's openness and Kamala's radical hardline stance.

Bitcoin Minute: RFK vs Trump vs Kamala on Bitcoin

You might have seen this infographic floating around on X. In my view, it overstates RFK's contributions and understate Trump's openness more than warranted. While RFK is a solid Bitcoin candidate (though his policies in other areas are questionable), we need to be honest about the facts. Let’s break this down.

Image
No original source cited; it's just all over X

Many of the policies RFK is credited with supporting, which Trump supposedly does not, logically follow from Trump’s existing positions. For example, if Trump supports self-custody, it’s reasonable to infer that he also supports running a node at home. Trump has also voiced support for Bitcoin mining and likely understands its role in promoting clean energy and a resilient grid.

Regarding the purchase of 4 million bitcoins, this claim misses the point. While Trump hasn’t explicitly ruled it out, he has stated his intention to form a Strategic Bitcoin Stockpile.

On the tax-related points, Trump has an intimate understanding of the tax code and has consistently advocated for lowering taxes. Again, while he hasn’t directly addressed these issues, he’s certainly open to the ideas—unlike Kamala Harris, who is clearly opposed. Leaving a blank space for Trump in these areas is not the same as being against them entirely, as Kamala Harris would be.

Supporting a Treasury Secretary from the Bitcoin community is, in my opinion, odd. You want the most qualified individual, not a Bitcoin DEI hire.

Julian Assange is already free, and it’s likely that any remaining investigations or legal pursuits will be dropped. As for pardoning Edward Snowden, while it’s something that should happen, I’m unsure whether Trump would do it—but it is possible.

RFK's platform includes other policies that could contradict his Bitcoin stance or harm the economy overall. For instance, he supports strict environmental regulations that could conflict with Bitcoin mining. He also advocates for increased government spending through universal childcare coverage. Additionally, his proposal to raise the minimum wage will hurt low-income families by forcing companies to lay off workers.

Here’s how I would revise the checklist:


Hold strong and have a great day,

Ansel


DONATE directly on Strike or Cash App to support my work! You make my content possible! Thank you.


Disclaimer: The content of Bitcoin & Markets shall not be construed as tax, legal or financial advice. Do you own research.